tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4376271571140705461.post3747888939221961679..comments2011-07-08T04:30:26.425-06:00Comments on Media Ethics: I'll just sit here on the fence, thank you very much.Nancy Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05201440673240187754noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4376271571140705461.post-48679655077530801732009-02-23T23:47:00.000-07:002009-02-23T23:47:00.000-07:00I wouldn't base deception on what I personally thi...I wouldn't base deception on what I personally think is important. That is no way to make a decision about something like this. If there is an injustice to human rights that all can collectively agree upon or unlawful activity, I think it should be uncovered. With that said though, doesn't that essentially put us on their level? It may not constitute serious injustice but it is deceptive. I don't know. I just run around in circles on this issue. I think of something that would be worthy of undercover investigation and then wonder how I'd do it but then, how would I publish it and stand behind it without question? Working unethically and being sneaky about – it just doesn't seem any better or any more acceptable than the behavior I am uncovering.Ariehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15587294484189126761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4376271571140705461.post-34167824466570227992009-02-21T12:29:00.000-07:002009-02-21T12:29:00.000-07:00Let me see if I've got it -- you would use decepti...Let me see if I've got it -- you <I>would</I> use deception, but only if it was the only way to get a story you thought was important? <BR/><BR/>Who decides what's important?Nancy Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05201440673240187754noreply@blogger.com